To begin this analysis, the question does not ask does knowledge give us a sense of who we are, it asks to what extent, meaning that it is implied that it does give us some sense of meaning to some extent. It isn’t asking me to prove the claim, as much as it is asking me to describe how true it is. The use of the word “gives” is an iffy term to use. In most cases, knowledge does not give us anything. We must take things from the knowledge through application and analysis. Though, there may be some occurrences where knowledge just gives us the answer to what we need. The “we” and “us” in the quote is ambiguous, in that it does not specify a certain group of people. Does it refer to us as humans? Or us as in every thing living? No matter the group it may be referring to, each individual on this earth, must have some sense of knowledge to know who we are as a person. This knowledge question tackles the ways of knowing, memory and reason, and areas of knowledge, human sciences and history.

The human sciences is home to subjects psychology, sociology, and political science. Those subjects are centered on the workings of people as individuals and as a group. Similar to history, they use reason and memory of past events to come to current conclusions of people's mental health. Psychology is the study of how the human mind works and focuses on behavior and psyche. This subject demonstrates who we are in our minds as individuals. Sociology is like psychology but for society as a whole. It focuses on the -isms, and why certain groups believe or act upon certain things. For example, let’s look at racism. Sociology looks into the operation of institutional racism in society. The inequality and prejudice seen today is analysed, from historical evidence, to view how certain demographics act as the perpetrator of racism and the victims of racism. Political science is an analysis on political behavior. This subject area mainly focuses on the group. Political behavior largely ties into someone’s ethical beliefs, which is a large part of how some people navigate through the day. Depending on the subject under human sciences, the topics could refer to shared or personal knowledge. For most, human sciences deals with groups. Even in psychology, they use data taken from groups of people to diagnose what your psyche is like. Human sciences works best in shared knowledge because of how the data is taken and distributed to people.

For a first shot at this sort of writing, this ain't half bad! You spend a lot of time "warming up" at the start. The stuff about "to what extent" may be extraneous, though the bit about "give" and "take" is fascinating.
ReplyDeleteYour introduction of ancestry in the history bit is a great move to connect to personal knowledge. When you want to talk about shared knowledge, though, it may be easier and clearer to use the group known as "nation-state", since it is often through the lens of this group that we interpret history. So you could even talk about the way that the slavery or the Civil War or the Civil Rights movement is constructed to give us an understanding of racial attitudes today. When we talk about race today, we are implicitly drawing on a certain understanding of our national history. And even more fascinating, different attitudes about race today are often based on different understandings of our national history. it is in this way that historical knowledge CONSTRUCTS the past to explain the present. Your explanation of the Human Sciences remains vague. Best to explain how talking about human minds in general gives us a 'sense of who we are' and then pick a SPECIFIC EXAMPLE of something that Psychology or sociology tells us (some actual KNOWLEDGE in that field) and talk through how it might give us a sense of who we are.
I just want an angel to get some buffalo wild wings.
ReplyDelete